Tesla FSD Hit Piece FLOPS As Audience ROASTS Bias: They Can’t Fool Anyone Anymore

Tesla FSD Capabilities and Limitations

🚗 Q: What major improvements came with Tesla's FSD version 13?
A: FSD v13, released in December 2024, added capabilities like reversing and navigating from garage to destination, but still requires constant human supervision.

🛑 Q: How does Tesla's FSD handle challenging driving scenarios?
A: FSD v13 struggles with construction zones, unmarked roads, and sudden lighting changes, often leading drivers to disengage out of caution.

🌍 Q: How did Tesla enable FSD in China without pre-mapping?
A: Tesla enabled FSD in China through a software update, allowing vehicles to scrape localized information about signage and driving conventions online.

Safety and Responsibility

👀 Q: Who is responsible for accidents when using Tesla's FSD?
A: The driver is always responsible, as FSD is a level 2 partially automated system requiring constant human supervision.

⚠️ Q: What concerns exist about Tesla's driver monitoring system?
A: Critics argue it's too permissive, allowing driver distraction and contributing to fatalities and hundreds of injury events.

🔍 Q: How transparent is Tesla with its FSD safety data?
A: Tesla's safety reporting is challenged due to filtering out dangerous drivers in 2022 and lack of reporting in 2023.

Public Perception and Marketing

📺 Q: How did the public react to CNBC's coverage of Tesla FSD?
A: Viewers criticized CNBC's piece as deceptive and misleading, noting a pattern of negative coverage on Elon Musk and Tesla.

🏷️ Q: How has Tesla adjusted its FSD marketing in different regions?
A: Tesla changed FSD names to "supervised" in the US and "intelligent assisted driving" in China due to marketing challenges in Europe.

🚕 Q: What is Tesla's latest development in autonomous vehicles?
A: Tesla unveiled a two-seater robo taxi in October, set to operate autonomously in Austin, Texas starting June 2025.

Comparison with Competitors

🏁 Q: How does Tesla's approach to autonomous driving differ from competitors?
A: Tesla is beta testing with consumers on public roads, while companies like Waymo have launched fully autonomous cabs in several US cities.

Expert Opinions and Concerns

🔒 Q: What do safety experts recommend for Tesla's FSD?
A: Experts call for better safeguards to keep drivers actively engaged, as passive supervision is deemed less effective.

👨💼 Q: What regulatory involvement do experts advocate for?
A: Experts push for more transparency from automakers and increased regulatory involvement from NHTSA.

User Experience and Behavior

🚦 Q: How does Tesla remind drivers to stay attentive while using FSD?
A: Tesla displays on-screen reminders to pay attention every time FSD is engaged.

💧 Q: What human-like behaviors does Tesla's FSD exhibit?
A: FSD demonstrates human-like behavior by avoiding obstacles such as puddles and bushes.

Future Outlook

📈 Q: How has Tesla's FSD progressed in recent years?
A: FSD has shown significant improvements over the past three years, with fans optimistic about future advancements.

🔮 Q: Is Tesla's FSD ready for unsupervised use?
A: Safety experts agree FSD is not yet ready for use without a driver at the wheel and requires better safeguards.

Consumer Advice

🛒 Q: What should potential buyers know about Tesla's FSD capabilities?
A: Tesla clearly articulates FSD's capabilities and required driver supervision on their website before purchase.

🔄 Q: How consistent is FSD's performance across updates?
A: FSD upgrades bring new features but also quality fluctuations, with performance varying between versions.

Tesla's FSD Advancements and Challenges

🚗 Tesla's FSD has evolved significantly over the past three years, adopting end-to-end machine learning in 2024 to improve its generalized driving capabilities without pre-mapping every road.

🤖 Version 13 of Tesla's FSD, unveiled in October and running on their dedicated robo taxi, will operate autonomously on real roads in Austin, Texas in June 2025.

🧠 FSD version 13 demonstrates significant advancements in real-world intelligence and perception, navigating unmarked dirt roads and avoiding obstacles like puddles and bushes.

Safety and Monitoring Concerns

⚠️ Despite being statistically safer than human drivers, Tesla's FSD still makes mistakes and is not fully autonomous, requiring constant human supervision.

👁️ FSD's driver monitoring system is criticized for constant nags demanding attention, while being historically permissive and potentially easy to fool.

🚫 Experts argue that putting experimental FSD software in untrained consumers' hands is dangerous and should be banned on public roads.

Media Coverage and Public Perception

📺 CNBS published a hit piece on Tesla's FSD just before their robo taxi launch, raising questions about potential bias due to funding from automotive competitors.

💬 Viewer comments reveal strong objections to perceived deceptive, misleading, and biased reporting, accusing CNBS of showcasing old software versions and fake demonstrations.

🌐 Tesla faced marketing challenges in Europe and China, prompting name changes to "supervised" and "intelligent assisted driving" respectively.

Legal and Ethical Implications

⚖️ Lawsuits allege FSD is defective, unsafe, and has contributed to catastrophic injuries, with plaintiffs represented in four separate cases against Tesla.

🔬 Critics argue Tesla is using the public as guinea pigs for research and development, raising ethical concerns about testing on public roads.

📊 Tesla's safety reports have been questioned, with the 2022 report filtering out most dangerous drivers and the 2023 report omitting FSD data.

User Behavior and System Limitations

🚶 Research shows users tend to engage in forbidden behaviors as they become familiar with partially automated systems, despite explicit warnings.

🚲 FSD still struggles with certain situations, such as turning near a bicycle rack, and can fail in unpredictable, inconsistent ways.

🛑 Safety experts advocate for better safeguards to keep users actively engaged, as passive supervision is ineffective with this technology.

Future Developments and Expectations

🔮 Tesla's compact, spacious two-seater robo taxi with ample legroom is set to operate autonomously after extensive training in controlled environments.

📈 FSD upgrades bring new features and fluctuations in quality, with version 12 improving city street driving to surpass highway performance.

🔍 The discrepancy between video content and real-world performance of Tesla's FSD suggests that skepticism may be limited to those who have not experienced the system firsthand.

• 00:00 🚗 CNBS's biased video on Tesla's FSD misrepresents its capabilities and is criticized for outdated information and influence from competing advertisers, despite ongoing advancements in the technology.
  • CNBS's recent video on Tesla's FSD is perceived as biased and a hit piece, likely influenced by the advertising dollars from competing automotive manufacturers.
  • The video is criticized for promoting a biased negative narrative about Tesla's FSD, misrepresenting its current capabilities and relying on outdated information.
  • Critics highlight that a CNBS video on Tesla is misleading, showcasing old software and biased reporting influenced by automotive advertisers.
  • Tesla's full self-driving technology, despite some negative perceptions, is advancing with new features and aims to transform existing cars into robo-taxis.
  • Despite improvements in Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, it still requires human oversight and occasionally makes mistakes, leading to mixed reactions from users and observers.
  • Tesla was inaccurately portrayed as the worst in strategy and execution.
• 09:34 🚗 Tesla's FSD faces scrutiny for inconsistent performance and safety concerns, requiring human oversight despite showcasing impressive capabilities, especially in China, while media bias and the need for real-world testing remain critical issues.
  • The video critiques the credibility of an expert promoting Tesla's full self-driving technology, highlighting its inconsistent performance, safety concerns, and the company's history of overpromising automation advancements.
  • Tesla's FSD requires constant human supervision, and while it prevents more accidents than it causes, the narrative often focuses on its faults amid the company's declining reputation and Elon Musk's controversial actions.
  • Skeptics of Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) should try it themselves, as it offers impressive capabilities but still requires human oversight due to safety concerns.
  • Tesla's FSD demonstrates significant capabilities in China with minimal localized training, supporting Musk's claim of a generalized autonomous driving solution, despite some lingering biases in the media coverage.
  • Tesla's FSD version 13, now primarily driven by AI, is being rolled out to newer vehicles, but its performance in real-world scenarios remains uncertain despite extensive testing.
  • The true test of the software's capabilities will be its performance on real roads, not in controlled environments like movie sets.
• 19:20 🚗 Tesla's Full Self-Driving has made notable improvements in city driving and obstacle navigation, but critical safety concerns remain due to outdated footage and inconsistent performance.
  • Tesla's Full Self-Driving has improved significantly, especially in city driving, but still has critical errors that could pose safety risks, as noted by both users and professional testers.
  • The video criticizes the use of outdated footage to misrepresent Tesla's FSD progress, suggesting potential deception in the portrayal of its current performance.
  • FSD shows improved performance and superhuman reaction times, but drivers often intervene out of caution, questioning whether the system would have safely navigated certain situations.
  • Tesla's FSD technology effectively navigates challenging situations, such as construction zones and unmarked roads, demonstrating advanced real-world intelligence and adaptability.
  • Tesla's FSD demonstrates humanlike behavior in avoiding obstacles but struggles with lighting changes and inconsistent performance, raising safety concerns.
  • Brae Halder noted significant improvements in Tesla's FSD driving behavior, making it resemble human driving, despite using the older hardware 3.
• 26:49 🚗 Tesla's FSD shows potential but faces skepticism over safety, driver attention, and ongoing legal scrutiny despite claims of being safer than human drivers.
  • Tesla's full self-driving technology shows promise for improvement, but skepticism remains due to concerns about driver attention and safety.
  • Tesla's driver monitoring system is criticized for being insufficiently strict, allowing drivers to become distracted despite existing safeguards.
  • Tesla's partially automated driving systems face multiple lawsuits alleging defects and safety issues linked to fatalities and injuries.
  • Tesla's driver assist systems are under federal investigation, with concerns raised about drivers misunderstanding the need for constant supervision, as illustrated by a tragic case involving a fatal accident.
  • Tesla's software can be safer than human drivers on average, but it still requires constant supervision and can make mistakes.
  • The debate over Tesla's FSD name changes is trivial, as the company clearly communicates the software's capabilities to consumers regardless of the name.
• 32:58 🚗 Critics misunderstand Tesla's clear communication on software capabilities and unfairly target the company for accidents that are common across the industry.
  • Critics argue that Tesla clearly communicates its software capabilities, dismissing claims of confusion as unfounded and irrelevant.
  • Critics misunderstand Tesla's clear warnings about its vehicles not being fully autonomous, leading to misguided outrage and legal challenges.
  • Critics argue that Tesla's experimental software is being irresponsibly tested on untrained consumers, while the company defends itself by blaming driver negligence for accidents.
  • Critics of Tesla's FSD are inconsistent, as all companies with driver assistance technology face accidents, yet only Tesla is scrutinized.
  • Beta testing of retail customers on public roads should be completely banned.
• 37:27 🚗 Tesla's FSD faces scrutiny over hardware compatibility, safety claims, and transparency in crash data, as it aims for unsupervised self-driving by 2024.
  • Tesla's FSD may require costly hardware upgrades for older vehicles, raising concerns about compatibility and safety as Musk admits some cars may never achieve level 5 self-driving.
  • Autonomous cars must demonstrate significantly higher safety levels than human drivers, but current evidence shows they do not yet provide clear safety benefits over existing human driving capabilities.
  • Tesla's 2022 safety report on FSD is criticized for only including high-scoring drivers, leading to calls for greater transparency and regulatory involvement in future safety data.
  • NHTSA has significant regulatory power but rarely uses it, leading to challenges in understanding crash data, while a misleading graphic on advanced driver assistance system crashes lacks context and may contain duplicates.
  • The lack of context in crash data comparisons between Tesla and other manufacturers misrepresents the safety of Tesla's level 2 ADAS software, potentially misleading the audience.
  • Tesla aims to launch unsupervised full self-driving by the end of 2024, prioritizing safety while gradually expanding its service and allowing owners to join the robo taxi fleet.
• 43:06 🚗 Tesla's commitment to safety in autonomous vehicle development is challenged by skepticism and regulatory hurdles, as a biased critique of its FSD technology raises questions about fairness in the automotive industry.
  • Tesla, known for producing the safest vehicles, would not jeopardize its reputation by launching extremely dangerous technology, raising questions about the validity of claims against its autonomy efforts.
  • Tesla prioritizes safety in its autonomous vehicle development, countering claims of danger with a commitment to reducing accidents and saving lives.
  • Tesla is testing its robo taxi, the cyber cab, in Texas due to looser regulations, while facing tougher approval processes in California, and has demonstrated its FSD technology moving vehicles within its factory, albeit with safety concerns.
  • There is a critical need for federal regulations and safety standards, including driving tests, for autonomous vehicles in the U.S. to ensure public safety.
  • Whimo has launched fully autonomous cabs in several cities, while Tesla faces skepticism about its ability to deliver safe driverless vehicles by its deadlines, with experts advocating for better safety measures.
  • The video critiques a biased negative piece on Tesla, noting it included some positive aspects and questioning why similar scrutiny isn't applied to other automakers, while suggesting that self-interest drives the participants' appearances.

WatchUrl: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtzxuzrAT2o