Karl Popper: Challenging Science | Philosopher's Perspective | Stephen Hicks

The mark of a true scientist is the willingness to put their theories at risk and actively seek out possible refutations, challenging the traditional view of science as something firm and established 

Questions to inspire discussion

• What is the distinction between science and pseudoscience?

  —Karl Popper's "Conjectures and Refutations" explores the criteria for the scientific status of a theory, emphasizing the importance of falsifiability and empirical methods.

• How does science differ from pseudoscience and metaphysics?

  —Science can be distinguished from pseudoscience and metaphysics by its empirical method, which is essentially inductive and proceeds from observation or experiment.

• What is the importance of explanatory power in scientific theories?

  —The ability to explain all data is a sign of a strong theory, and the study of events should seek causal explanations rather than attributing them to fate, God's will, or conversion and revelation.

• How does Karl Popper view the scientific status of certain theories?

  —Karl Popper had doubts about the scientific status of Marxist theory, psychoanalysis, and individual psychology, questioning the significance of confirmation and observation in verifying theories.

• What is the distinction between science and pseudo science based on?

  —The distinction between science and pseudo science is based on the falsifiability, refutability, or testability of a theory, according to Karl Popper's proposal. 

Key Insights

• 📚 Popper's book "Conjectures and Refutations" raises the question of when a theory should be ranked as scientific, challenging the traditional view of science as something firm and established.
• 🧠 The contrast between science and metaphysics lies in the approach, with science starting at the bottom with specific data and observations, while metaphysics starts at the top with general propositions.
• 🌌 Karl Popper suggests that Marx, Freud, and Adler's theories may be in the same category as alchemy and astrology, challenging their classification as scientific theories.
• 🌌 The confirmation of Einstein's theory of gravity through the observation of a distant star's light passing close to the Sun is a prime example of good science.
• 🌟 The impressive thing about Einstein's theory was the risk involved in the prediction, as it could potentially disconfirm the theory if the predicted effect was absent.
• 🌌 Karl Popper emphasizes the importance of looking for possible refutations of a theory, not just confirmations, in the pursuit of scientific knowledge.
• 🧪 The mark of a scientist is the willingness to put the theory at risk, while unscientific people are protective of their beliefs and never put them at risk.
• 🧪 Popper's discussion of the logic of falsifiability and scientific methodologies challenges the distinction between science and pseudo-science.

#Philosophy #KarlPopper #StephenHicks 

Clips 

• 00:00 🔍 Science, according to Karl Popper, is about testing and refuting speculative ideas, using logic, math, and empirical methods to arrive at beliefs, not just confirming established beliefs.
  • Karl Popper's "Conjectures and Refutations" explores the distinction between science and pseudoscience, questioning the criteria for the scientific status of a theory and emphasizing the importance of falsifiability.
  • Science is not just about confirming established beliefs, but also about testing and refuting speculative ideas.
  • Science is not just a set of beliefs or principles, but rather a method of using logic, math, and empirical and experimental methods to arrive at those beliefs.
  • Doing an experiment assigned by a teacher does not make one scientific, as true science involves critical thinking and understanding of theories.
• 04:30 🔬 Science is an attitude of using the mind with empirical methods, distinguishing it from pseudoscience and metaphysics, which are speculative and not grounded in empirical data.
  • Science is not just a set of beliefs or principles, but an attitude or disposition in how one uses their mind with respect to methods and doctrines.
  • Science can be distinguished from pseudoscience and metaphysics by its empirical method, which is essentially inductive and proceeds from observation or experiment.
  • Metaphysics is speculative and not grounded in empirical data, while science starts with particular observations and works its way up to generalizations.
  • The speaker discusses the distinction between genuinely empirical and pseudo-empirical methods, using astrology as an example of the latter.
• 08:38 🔬 Einstein's theory of relativity is a gold standard for scientific theories, contrasting with unscientific theories like Marx, Freud, and Adler's, and Karl Popper had doubts about their scientific status.
  • Einstein's theory of relativity is used as a gold standard for scientific theories, contrasting it with the speculative and unscientific nature of Marx, Freud, and Adler's theories.
  • Einstein's theory of relativity was confirmed by Eddington's Eclipse observations, showing that light is subject to gravitational forces.
  • The problem is that the effect of gravitational force is difficult to detect on Earth, but Einstein's theory was confirmed through observations of a distant star's light passing close to the Sun.
  • Scientific theories are based on empirical data from experiments, but Karl Popper had doubts about the scientific status of Marxist theory, psychoanalysis, and individual psychology.
  • The speaker discusses the importance of explanatory power in scientific theories and how the ability to explain all data is a sign of a strong theory.
  • The study of events should seek causal explanations rather than attributing them to fate, God's will, or conversion and revelation.
• 15:38 🔍 Karl Popper challenges the significance of confirmation and observation in verifying theories, highlighting the tendency to conform to social beliefs and the overemphasis on confirmation and verification in epistemology.
  • The belief in a theory can be influenced by social and psychological factors, leading to a religious-like adherence to the theory and a dismissal of opposing views.
  • The speaker discusses the tendency to conform to social beliefs and the overemphasis on confirmation and verification in epistemology, using the example of a Marxist finding confirming evidence for their interpretation of history in every newspaper.
  • Freudian analysts claim their theories were constantly verified by clinical observations, but Karl Popper questions the significance of confirmation and observation in verifying theories.
  • Two examples of human behavior are used to illustrate the scientific process of explaining empirical facts through theory.
  • Human behavior can be explained by Freud's theory of the inferiority complex, but Popper argues that this explanation is too broad and can be applied to any behavior, making it an inadequate scientific theory.
• 21:07 🔬 Science is about testing and potentially refuting theories, as demonstrated by Einstein's willingness to put his theory to the test, according to Popper.
  • The strength of a theory lies in its ability to be tested and potentially refuted, as demonstrated by Einstein's willingness to put his theory to the test.
  • Einstein's theory of gravitational effects is not just seeking confirmation, but also looking for possible refutations through experiments.
  • Popper argues that true science involves testing theories and being willing to accept evidence that could refute them, unlike non-scientists who are unwilling or unable to do so.
  • Science should not be about easily obtaining confirmations for theories, but rather about making risky predictions that put the theory at risk of being false.
• 25:59 🔬 Scientists risk their theories, while unscientific people protect their beliefs; a good scientific theory forbids certain things, must be refutable, and evidence should only count if it results from a genuine test.
  • Scientists are willing to put their theories at risk, while unscientific people are protective of their beliefs and unwilling to do so, and a good scientific theory is one that forbids certain things from happening.
  • A theory that cannot be refuted by any conceivable event is nonscientific, and every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it.
  • Evidence should only count if it results from a genuine test of the theory, and Popper suggests using the term "corroboration" instead of "confirmation" to avoid the baggage of the latter term, and also notes that some false theories are upheld by introducing ad hoc auxiliary assumptions.
  • The speaker discusses the importance of not continuously adding ad hoc assumptions to protect a theory, as it lowers its scientific status.
  • The distinction between science and pseudo science is based on the falsifiability, refutability, or testability of a theory, according to Karl Popper's proposal.
• 32:25 🔍 Popper challenges Hume's rejection of induction, argues against Kant's view of subjective structures in nature, and proposes a different approach to skepticism.
  • Hume was partly right and partly wrong in his rejection of the principle of induction, as Popper argues that induction cannot be logically justified and comes to be a myth.
  • Popper argues that Hume is correct in his logic, but his psychological explanation of induction is unsatisfactory, and he suggests a different approach to respond to Hume's skepticism, while also pointing out that Kant was partly correct but also wrong in some respects.
  • Kant argues that our minds have inbuilt structures that filter and construct reality, but Popper believes that while our intellect imposes subjective structures on nature, it does not necessarily succeed in imposing them.
• 36:47 🔍 If Kant is correct about inbuilt structures filtering reality, we should never make mistakes, but we do, so science is about recognizing and correcting those mistakes.

------------------------------------- 0:38:15 2024-03-10T17:26:46Z