At long last, the chickens have come home to roost for disgraced Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani. A federal just just ordered that the two Georgia state election workers Giuliani defamed, Shaye Moss and Ruby Freeman, can now seize and sell Rudys high-priced New York apartment, his luxury cars, his expensive watch collection, his sports memorabilia, and can take control of money in his bank accounts. As the Hill reported, "Judge orders Giuliani to hand over assets to Georgia election workers."
This video discusses the importance of this development and how it will serve the legal principles of specific and general deterrence, hopefully convincing others NOT to follow in Rudy's corrupt and defamatory footsteps.
If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts and mission, you can becoming a Team Justice patron at:
https://www.patreon.com/glennkirschner
And you can find my audio podcast, Justice Matters, wherever you usually get your podcasts.
And my website at glennkirschner.com
Follow me on:
Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirschner2
On August 17, 2023, a police officer in Florida pulled over a woman for speeding and swerving on Del Prado Boulevard. The driver initially cooperated but showed signs of impairment, including slurred speech and the smell of alcohol. When asked to undergo sobriety tests, she hesitated and resisted, denying drinking despite a passenger admitting she'd had tequila earlier. After refusing a breathalyzer test and resisting arrest, the officer took her into custody, and her vehicle was impounded. She was charged with DUI, resisting arrest, and reckless driving, with the case proceeding to court.
Video Credits and a Huge Shoutout to:
YouTube Channel: Florida DUI Cam ( @FLDUICAM )
We extend our heartfelt thanks to Florida DUI Cam for generously providing this wonderful and amazing police bodycam footage to the community.
Full Original Video Link: https://youtu.be/YHTrkaXKaiA?si=u9-BNMjuWvYdvNR1
*NOTE THIS VIDEO FALLS UNDER THE FAIR USE AND FAIR DEALING POLICY*
We adhere to YouTube’s community guidelines and fair use policies. Our content offers unique perspectives through transformative commentary, memes, stock footage, and meticulous editing. Our videos are 100% legal and protected under fair use and fair dealing exceptions. This includes narration, commentary, review, reaction, and analysis. We deliver criticism, reviews, educational insights, and in-depth research, all protected under fair use. According to Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, we bring you the best editing and transformative content, adding educational and entertainment value.
Disclaimer:
The BodyCam Explorer shares police body camera footage of officer and civilian interactions for educational and informational purposes. The aim is to improve the relationship between the police and the public by providing unbiased footage of any misconduct by officers or civilians. The intention is not to embarrass, scoff, or defame anyone involved. The video is made purely for entertainment purposes, and any copyrights belong to their rightful owners. There is no copyright infringement or commercial benefit intended. Fair use is permitted for non-profit, educational, or personal purposes under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976.
The importance of consistency, cross-examination, and logical reasoning in legal trials is highlighted through various cases, emphasizing the challenges faced by defendants and the critical role of credible evidence in achieving justice Questions to inspire discussion Credibility and Evidence in Sexual Assault Trials 🧑⚖️Q: How crucial is the complainant's testimony in sexual assault trials? A: In sexual assault trials, the prosecution's case often relies solely on the complainant's testimony, with no corroborating evidence, as long as the judge finds it credible and believable. 🔍Q: Why is cross-examination important in these cases? A: Cross-examination is vital to challenge the complainant's...
Judge Chutkan denied Trump's motion to delay the public release of 2000 pages worth of documents in Trump's 2020 election interference case, making clear that it is Trump who is seeking to inject politics into the litigations
Upon release of nearing 2000 pages of documents, we discovered that tons of the evidence is related - hidden from view behind black bars.
What can we glean from the number and nature of the redactions? Well, prosecutors often make such redactions to protect the integrity on ongoing investigations. So might more federal indictments be coming in the 2020 election subversion case?
If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts and mission, you can becoming a Team Justice patron at:
https://www.patreon.com/glennkirschner
And you can find my audio podcast, Justice Matters, wherever you usually get your podcasts.
And my website at glennkirschner.com
Follow me on:
Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirschner2
The complexities of capacity and consent, particularly in cases involving intoxication and memory loss, necessitate careful communication and evaluation of evidence to determine the validity of consent in legal contexts Questions to inspire discussion Legal Obligations and Defenses 🧑⚖️Q: What is a trial judge's responsibility regarding defenses? A: A trial judge must present all defenses with an "air of reality" to the jury, even if not raised by the defense, to provide necessary tools for reaching a decision based on trial evidence. 🤔Q: How does the defense of "honest but mistaken belief in consent" work? A: It's a denial...
