Canada's Military and Ideological Strife: A Critical Examination

Jordan B Peterson -

Canada's Military and Ideological Strife: A Critical Examination

Original post

This analysis delves into the claim that the Canadian military is influenced by radical leftist narratives, comparing it to trends in universities like MIT and Harvard.

It examines biases and critiques the impact on military morale and mission effectiveness.

Detection and Analysis

Biases Detected:

  1. Cognitive Bias: The post shows a tendency to generalize complex issues, attributing broad societal trends to specific ideological movements.
  2. Psychological Bias: There's a clear tone of frustration and condemnation, which may affect the neutrality of the analysis.
  3. Political Bias: The critique is aimed at leftist or Marxist ideologies, indicating a conservative or right-leaning perspective.
  4. National Bias: The focus is on Canadian and American institutions, potentially overlooking global contexts or different national approaches.
  5. Sociological Bias: The post reflects a view that societal structures are being unduly influenced by certain political ideologies.
  6. Philosophical/Ideological Bias: There's an apparent disapproval of what is perceived as radical or extreme political thought.

Analysis of Ideas and Concepts:


  1. Recognition of the potential impact of ideological narratives on military morale (Agreement: 65%).
  2. Concern about the influence of political ideologies in non-political institutions (Agreement: 60%).
  3. Awareness of the broader societal trends affecting various institutions (Agreement: 55%).
  4. Insight into the importance of maintaining neutrality and focus in military missions (Agreement: 50%).
  5. Acknowledgment of the need for balance between social justice and operational effectiveness (Agreement: 45%).


  1. Generalization and oversimplification of the ideologies and their impact (Agreement: 35%).
  2. The portrayal of universities and military institutions as uniformly subscribing to a specific narrative (Agreement: 30%).
  3. The assumption of intent to demoralize or undermine institutions (Agreement: 25%).
  4. The lack of differentiation between various leftist ideologies (Agreement: 20%).
  5. The unaddressed potential for positive aspects of social justice narratives (Agreement: 15%).

Closing Synopsis: The post presents a critical perspective on the influence of leftist ideologies in the Canadian military and prestigious universities. While raising valid concerns about the impact on institutional integrity and effectiveness, it is important to approach such issues with nuanced understanding and recognition of the diversity of perspectives and intentions.

Rating Scores:

  • Rationality: 60% | ★★★☆☆
  • Truth: 55% | ★★★☆☆
  • Mental Health: 50% | ★★★☆☆
  • Philosophy: 65% | ★★★☆☆
  • National: 70% | ★★★☆☆
  • Political: 60% | ★★★☆☆
  • Sociology: 55% | ★★★☆☆

This analysis reflects an evaluation of the biases and ideas within the post, considering the broader implications for military effectiveness and societal dynamics.


Leave a comment

#WebChat .container iframe{ width: 100%; height: 100vh; }